Human rights are the fundamental cornerstone of human civilization, justice, and democracy, providing a legal guarantee for every individual to live freely, with dignity, and equally by birth. Following the unimaginable genocide of World War II, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights issued by the United Nations in 1948 laid a strong, epoch-making foundation in this field. With the continuous passage of time, the expansion of consciousness, and the multidimensional needs of society, the scope of human rights did not remain limited only to traditional civil and political freedoms. In today’s contemporary world, this scope has expanded to broader dimensions of economic-social justice, women’s empowerment, collective identity of marginalized communities, and sustainable development including a clean environment. These diverse rights are interrelated and indivisible, for which the United Nations and its international conventions have been providing a global legal road-map to implement in practice.
Although human rights were viewed merely as an individual’s political freedom for a long period of history, modern philosophy encompasses every aspect of human life within its periphery. Citizens living with hungry stomachs and scarcity cannot genuinely enjoy civil liberties, nor can human dignity be secured as long as environmental destruction and social discrimination persist. Therefore, the diplomatic resolutions and binding conventions passed by the United Nations General Assembly and Security Council at various times have played a watchdog role in the protection of human rights. Such international documents have established a binding policy foundation for all member states worldwide to amend their domestic laws, guarantee the rights of citizens, and bring violators within the legal ambit.
While the contemporary world is achieving unprecedented technological development and extreme material prosperity on one hand, it is facing serious challenges such as institutional inequality, climate crisis, digital surveillance, and armed conflict on the other. Although emerging and developing nations like Nepal have fully ratified these international conventions and made provisions for excellent fundamental rights in their constitutions, a huge gap still exists at the level of practical implementation. The fact that the benefits enshrined in law fail to reach the grass-roots level and marginalized citizens, the lack of resources, and the helplessness of certain international mechanisms due to geopolitical interests have hindered the full enjoyment of human rights. Therefore, understanding the traditional and innovative dimensions of human rights in an integrated manner, overcoming their challenges, and translating international commitments into domestic practice is the shared global agenda today.
Civil, Political and Economic Rights
Civil and political rights are the fundamental pillars of human civilization, individual liberty, and democracy, safeguarding individual self-respect from potential state oppression and arbitrary decisions. In the traditional classification of human rights, these are called ‘first-generation rights,’ whose primary objective is to ensure individual autonomy, safety of life, and physical-mental integrity. In the language of legal and political theory, these are also considered ‘negative rights’ because, for the enjoyment of these rights, the state must refrain from undue interference in the private, religious, and political affairs of citizens. The United Nations General Assembly made this legally mandatory by adopting the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in 1966.
Its theoretical foundation was established through the natural rights theory of liberal philosophers like John Locke in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the American War of Independence, and the French Revolution. This Covenant has set strict legal guarantees for individual freedom and judicial fairness, among which the non-derogable right to life and security, the right against torture and slavery, freedom from arbitrary arrest, and the right to a fair trial are prominent. Furthermore, freedom of thought, conscience, religion, expression, and information provides citizens with the legal power to constructively criticize the state. According to international law, even during war or national emergency, non-derogable rights such as the right to life, the right against torture, and freedom of thought and conscience cannot be suspended under any pretext.
On the other hand, economic, social, and cultural rights are ‘second-generation rights’ in the evolution of human rights, ensuring the minimum conditions necessary for an individual to live a dignified and secure life in society. While civil rights are called negative because they direct the state not to interfere, these rights are considered ‘positive rights’ as they direct the state to be active and provide resources for the welfare of citizens. The main philosophy of these rights is to liberate humans from scarcity, hunger, and ignorance, because a hungry stomach cannot truly enjoy freedom and democracy. The United Nations expanded the scope of human rights and made it indivisible by adopting a separate international covenant on this subject in 1966.
This second generation of rights guarantees the right to work for an individual’s livelihood, equal pay for work of equal value, a safe working environment, reasonable working hours, and the right to form trade unions. Additionally, social security in old age, disability, illness, or unemployment, an adequate standard of living (food, clothing, shelter), free primary education, and the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health are included. Since implementing these rights requires massive investment and physical infrastructure, the Covenant accepts the principle of ‘progressive realization,’ meaning the state must continuously move forward by utilizing the maximum available resources. However, non-discriminatory treatment and the obligation to meet minimum core obligations must be implemented immediately.
Nepal ratified both of these international covenants simultaneously on May 14, 1991, without any conditions, thereby accepting the international legal obligation to ensure the civil liberties and economic-social security of its citizens. According to Section 9 of the Nepal Treaty Act, 1990 (2047 BS), ratified international treaties apply on par with national laws, and in case of conflict with domestic laws, the provisions of the treaty prevail, holding a strong constitutional status. On this very foundation, Part 3 of the current Constitution of Nepal explicitly includes the right to live with dignity, the right to freedom, and the rights to education, health, housing, food, and labor as fundamental rights. However, although Nepal’s framework is excellent legally, the weak state of public schools and hospitals, widespread unemployment, and completing the transitional justice process from the armed conflict period remain major practical challenges.
Women’s Rights and International Conventions
Women’s rights are not merely a matter of social justice or charity, but a fundamental, mandatory, and indivisible part of overall human rights. When the United Nations issued its Charter in 1945, it explicitly mentioned the equal rights of men and women in the preamble, establishing it as a global agenda. The real meaning of women’s rights is to guarantee equal opportunities on par with men by uprooting the deep patriarchal discrimination, violence, and structural inequality faced by women simply for being women. Although women were viewed as second-class citizens for a long period of history, various UN resolutions and conventions have elevated this from a matter of pity to the high ground of legal claims and human rights.
The document that proved to be the most significant milestone in this direction is the ‘Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’ (CEDAW), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1979, which is regarded as the international bill of rights for women. This Convention provides a clear legal definition of discrimination against women and makes it binding for state parties to end all forms of discrimination in nationality, education, health, employment, property rights, and marriage. Countries ratifying this Convention must amend their national laws to remove discriminatory provisions against women. Nepal ratified this Convention without any conditions in 1991, accepting the legal obligation to ensure the rights of its citizens.
Similarly, the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, adopted at the Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995, gave global recognition to the powerful message that ‘women’s rights are human rights.’ It identified twelve critical areas of concern, such as education, health, women’s participation in decision-making, and a life free from violence, while putting forward the concept of gender mainstreaming in every policy and plan of the state. Likewise, domestic and sexual violence, which was historically ignored as a private or family matter, was turned into a public human rights issue by the 1993 United Nations Declaration. It made it clear that violence against women can never be justified in the name of culture, religion, or tradition, and living a life free from violence is a legal right of women.
The modern dimension of women’s rights places high priority on women’s bodily integrity, reproductive health rights, and economic empowerment. Under this, every woman is guaranteed the right to self-determination regarding her own body and reproduction, safe motherhood, and easy access to family planning resources. In addition, Sustainable Development Goal 5 (SDG 5) and the International Labour Organization emphasize equal pay for equal work, ownership over property and land, access to financial resources, and the economic accounting of unpaid care work performed within the home. Since economic empowerment increases women’s bargaining power in decision-making processes, it reduces domestic violence and contributes positively to the overall economy of the country.
For the meaningful participation of women in political leadership and peace-building, Resolution 1325 adopted by the United Nations Security Council in 2000 made the specific role of women mandatory in war, conflict, and peace processes. Article 38 of the current Constitution of Nepal ensures women’s rights as a fundamental right, guaranteeing equal lineage rights, equal rights to ancestral property, safe motherhood, and the right to participate in all state organs based on the principle of proportional inclusion. Consequently, currently 41 percent of local representatives and 33 percent of federal parliament members are women leaders. However, although Nepal appears strong legally, harmful practices such as Chhaupadi, dowry, witchcraft accusations, and administrative complexities in acquiring citizenship remain challenges in practice.
Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Minorities
The concept of collective rights has been established as an important, just, and indispensable turning point in the evolution of human rights. Although traditional human rights often center on the individual, discussing their freedom and security, individual rights alone are insufficient for indigenous peoples, minorities, and marginalized communities. Their language, distinct culture, ancestral land, indigenous identity, and traditional knowledge cannot survive through individual efforts alone but only through the unity and collective effort of the entire community. Therefore, collective rights transcend the ‘I’ to grant legal and international recognition to the collective existence of ‘We,’ which the United Nations accepts as the third generation of human rights or solidarity rights.
The ‘United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’ (UNDRIP), adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2007, has redefined the rights of indigenous peoples worldwide. This declaration grants indigenous peoples the right to self-determination to freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social, and cultural development priorities. Furthermore, it clarifies their collective right over the lands, territories, and natural resources they have traditionally owned or occupied, guaranteeing that the state cannot seize such lands or displace them without their consent. It has established indigenous rights as the minimum standard for international human rights.
Convention No. 169, adopted by the International Labour Organization in 1989, is the only legally binding international treaty specifically designed for indigenous and tribal peoples. The most crucial aspect of this legal document is the principle of ‘Free, Prior, and Informed Consent’ (FPIC), according to which the state or private sector must mandatorily obtain the consent of the concerned community before undertaking any development, construction, or extraction using the ancestral land, water, or forest of indigenous peoples. Such consent must be taken without any coercion, prior to the commencement of work, and only after informing them about the entire impact of the project. Nepal was the first country in South Asia to ratify this convention in 2007, providing a strong legal foundation for its indigenous peoples.
Minority rights refer to the rights of ethnic, religious, and linguistic groups that are numerically small compared to the total population of a country and lack influential access to governing power. This gained further international importance after the United Nations issued its declaration on the subject in 1992, the primary objective of which is to protect the physical existence and distinct identity of minorities from the dominance of the majority. This right gives minorities the freedom to enjoy their own culture, profess and practice their own religion, and use their own mother tongue. The essence of minority rights is to provide ‘protection of the minority’ within the ‘rule of the majority,’ which encourages tolerance, fraternity, and pluralism in society.
Since the lifestyle of indigenous peoples is inherently linked to natural resources, their traditional knowledge, skills, and identification of medicinal plants constitute the shared intellectual property of the entire community. The concept of collective rights provides protection against ‘bio-piracy,’ where external individuals or commercial companies steal their knowledge. Addressing collective rights, the current Constitution of Nepal opens the door for positive discrimination under the right to equality and ensures the right of every community to preserve its language, script, and culture, making provisions for various commissions such as Indigenous Peoples, Tharu, Muslim, and Madhesi commissions. However, in practice, challenges such as the lack of free, prior, and informed consent of indigenous peoples during hydro-power projects or road expansions and the lack of meaningful participation in decision-making still persist.
Development, Environment and Contemporary Conventions
The right to development and the right to a clean environment are regarded as ‘third-generation rights’ or ‘solidarity rights’ in contemporary human rights philosophy. While traditional civil and political rights spoke of protecting individuals from state oppression, these new rights prioritize the quality of human life, social justice, and environmental balance. The right to development claims that every human being and community is entitled to participate meaningfully in, and enjoy an equal share of the benefits resulting from, economic, social, and cultural progress. On the other hand, the right to a clean environment ensures a foundation for healthy living by protecting humans from polluted air, toxic water, and deteriorating ecosystems. With its recognition by the United Nations as a universal human rights standard, this right has now become an essential part of the ‘right to life.’
Although development and environment are often viewed as opposing forces, the modern concept seeks a balance between the two through ‘sustainable development.’ If development destroys the environment, it cannot be long-term, and if development is halted in the name of preserving the environment, human needs cannot be met. The ‘Declaration on the Right to Development’ adopted by the United Nations places humans at the center of development, where development is not just the construction of physical infrastructure but the expansion of human capabilities and the eradication of poverty. In this context, tools like Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and the ‘polluter pays principle,’ which mandates that the entity or industry causing environmental damage must handle its restoration and pay compensation to victims, are promoting responsible development.
International conventions adopted by the United Nations at various times to protect the human rights of specific vulnerable groups are of great significance. The 1965 ‘International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination’ (ICERD) completely prohibits all forms of discrimination based on race, color, or nationality. Similarly, the 1984 ‘Convention Against Torture’ (CAT) prohibits the infliction of inhumane treatment or physical/mental torture in custody or anywhere else. The 2006 ‘Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ (CRPD) grants citizens with disabilities equal opportunities and the right to live with dignity in society, while the 1990 ‘International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families’ (ICRMW) protects the human rights of workers employed abroad and their families.
In addition, the 1981 Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief gives every individual the right to choose their faith or religion and not to be discriminated against based on religion. The ‘Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas’ (UNDROP), adopted in 2018, safeguards the rights of peasants, the landless, and laborers living in villages over seeds, land, and natural resources. The principle of ‘inter-generational equity’ views the current generation not as the owners of the Earth but as ‘trustees’ or ‘custodians’ for future balance, according to which we cannot exhaust natural resources today for present economic gain.
Climate change has not only disrupted natural balance, but it has also created a severe crisis of ‘climate refugees,’ reversing achievements made in the field of human rights over decades. Here, the concept of ‘climate justice’ becomes relevant, which makes a moral demand that since wealthy nations warmed the earth by emitting more carbon, they must provide financial and technological compensation to enhance the adaptation capacity of poorer nations. Article 30 of the Constitution of Nepal ensures the right to live in a clean and healthy environment as a fundamental right. However, conflicts over deforestation in large projects like the Nijgadh Airport, rising air pollution in urban areas, and melting Himalayas are posing major practical challenges to our constitutional rights.
Conclusion and Recommendations
The detailed analysis of the modern evolution of human rights and various international conventions makes it clear that civil liberties, economic-social security, gender equality, collective identity, and environmental justice are indivisibly linked. For a pluralistic and environmentally sensitive nation like Nepal, having excellent legal documents and constitutional provisions is a positive aspect in itself, but translating these golden words written on paper into reality at the level of citizens’ kitchens and daily lives is the greatest need today.
To effectively implement international commitments on domestic ground and overcome contemporary human rights challenges, the implementation of the following policy and practical recommendations appears indispensable:
Effective Implementation and Monitoring of Constitutional Rights: The acts and regulations formulated to implement the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of Nepal – such as a clean environment, women, children, and indigenous peoples – must be strictly enforced down to the local level. Constitutional bodies such as the National Human Rights Commission, National Women Commission, and National Indigenous Peoples Commission must be provided with adequate resources, tools, and autonomy, and their monitoring systems must be elevated above partisan political influence to make them politically impartial and administratively robust.
Adoption of Sustainable and Eco-friendly Green Development: To minimize the conflict between development and environment, the process of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) must not be confined to a mere formality before starting any large infrastructure projects (such as roads, hydro-power, airports) but must be made transparent and scientific. While implementing the ‘polluter pays principle’ in practice to strictly penalize industries or entities causing environmental harm, investment in renewable and green energy must be increased as an alternative to traditional fossil fuels.
Respect for Collective Rights and Informed Consent: In line with the spirit of International Labour Organization Convention No. 169, the process of obtaining the ‘Free, Prior, and Informed Consent’ (FPIC) of local indigenous and marginalized communities when utilizing natural resources or operating development projects must be made legally mandatory and practically transparent. While preventing the displacement of indigenous peoples from their ancestral lands in the name of development, their indigenous knowledge and the collective intellectual property of biodiversity must be protected.
Logical Conclusion of Transitional Justice and International Diplomacy: In honoring the international covenants ratified by Nepal, human rights violations from the armed conflict period must be brought to a logical conclusion immediately through the transitional justice process (Truth and Reconciliation), ensuring justice, reparation, and closure for victims in accordance with international legal standards and Supreme Court orders. Furthermore, in international forums, Nepal must raise a strong, bold, and unified diplomatic voice in favor of ‘climate justice’ and workers’ rights regarding the impact of climate change and the safety of migrant workers.
Publish Date: June 27, 2026
Feedback